The Enthymeme in Aristotle's Rhetoric: From Argumentation Theory to Logic
Autor: | Antoine C. Braet |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 1999 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Informal Logic, Vol 19, Iss 2 (1999) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 0824-2577 2293-734X |
DOI: | 10.22329/il.v19i2.2322 |
Popis: | Which properties are characteristic of the enthymeme in Aristotle's Rhetoric? There is no consensus on this point. The present discussion centres on three properties. 1. Is there always an implicit premise? (Answer: Above all, a pragmatic level and a logical level must be distinguished.) 2. Do the premises consist by definition of probabilities and signs? (Answer: No.). 3. Are all enthymemes reducible to a syllogistic form? (Answer: The literature pertaining to this question is dominated by a false dilemma: an enthymeme does not have either a topical or a syllogistic structure). In general, Aristotle's approach to the enthymeme in the Rhetoric appears to shift from argumentation theory to logic. |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |