Development of History Teaching Materials with Addie
Autor: | Ifa Mufarocha, Achmad Noor Fatirul, Djoko Adi Waluyo |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | EDUCATIO: Journal of Education, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 188-197 (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 2579-8383 2579-8405 |
DOI: | 10.29138/educatio.v8i2.1263 |
Popis: | Teaching materials are all materials (whether information, tools, or text) that are systematically arranged, which display a complete figure of the competencies that will be mastered by students and used in the learning process with the aim of planning and studying the implementation of learning. Not only that, the interaction between teachers and students is not only through face-to-face relationships but also using teaching materials. The benefits of teaching materials in learning are so that students can take part in learning optimally and help facilitate understanding of the material. The models and procedures used in developing teaching materials are using the ADDIE model. In the implementation of the trials carried out 1) Initial stage, review with material experts, 2) Second stage, review with learning design experts. 3) The third stage, review with colleagues. 4) The fourth stage is small group trials 5) The fifth stage is medium group trials 6) And the last stage is field trials, namely large group trials. The type of development data is in the form of qualitative and quantitative. The type of qualitative data is in the form of input, responses and suggestions. Meanwhile, quantitative data was obtained by conducting product trials for small groups, medium groups and large groups using an assessment questionnaire. The results of the material expert trials obtained an average percentage of 97.5%, the results of the learning design expert trials an average percentage of 96.4%, the results of peer trials with an average percentage of 92.8%, the results of small group trials an average percentage of 90%, the results of group trials are an average percentage of 92,4% and the results of large group or field trials with an average percentage of 90%. |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |