Safe Zone for Percutaneous Screw Fixation - Talonavicular Fusion

Autor: Ashish Shah MD, Sung Lee BS, Sameer Naranje MD, MRCS, Zachariah Pinter BS, Robert Stibolt MS, Harshadkumar Patel MD, Henry DeBell BS, Eva Lehtonen BS, Andrew Moon BS
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, Vol 3 (2018)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2473-0114
24730114
DOI: 10.1177/2473011418S00430
Popis: Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Talonavicular fusion has been established as a reliable intervention for degenerative, inflammatory, and traumatic joint lesions as well as hindfoot deformities. In order to achieve optimal fusion, various versions of the procedure have been introduced in literature and have remained a topic of contention, with the most common variation involving the insertion of 1 to 3 screws dorsomedially and dorsolaterally. Dorsolateral screw placements commonly cause neurovasculature injury. The purpose of our cadaveric study was first to establish the safety of the dorsolateral percutaneous screw insertion in relation to these dorsal neurovascular structures, and then subsequently to standardize the ideal placement of the dorsolateral screw by comparing two insertion sites based on consistent bony landmarks. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaver legs amputated at the knee were used for this study. Percutaneous cannulated screws were inserted to perform isolated talonavicular arthrodesis. The screws were inserted at 3 consistent sites: “medial screw” at dorsomedial navicular where it intersected at the medial plane of the first cuneiform, “central screw” at the edge of dorsal navicular between medial and intermediate cuneiforms, and “lateral screw” at the edge of dorsal navicular between intermediate and lateral cuneiforms. Superficial and deep dissections were carried out to identify any injured nerves, arteries, and tendons. Results: The mean age at death in our sample of cadavers was 80.1 ± 7.5 years (range 68 to 92) and had the BMI of 21.8 ± 2.4 (range 18.1 to 25.1). There were 5 males (50.0%) and 5 females (50.0%). The medial screw injured the anterior tibialis tendon in 2 cases (20.0%), the central screw injured the extensor hallucis longus tendon in 3 cases (30.0%), and the lateral screw injured the anterior branch of SPN, lateral branch of SPN, and medial branch of DPN once each in a total of 3 cases (30.0%). Conclusion: TN fusion with central screw placement at the interspace between the medial and intermediate cuneiforms protects the neurovasculatures of the foot to a superior extent than lateral screws between the intermediate and lateral cuneiforms.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz: