| Autor: |
Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Mohaned Egred, Adrian P Banning, David Hildick-Smith, Marie-Claude Morice, Philippe Brunel, Alicia Le Bras, Arnaud Nze Ossima, Olivier Supplisson |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Open Heart, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2053-3624 |
| DOI: |
10.1136/openhrt-2023-002479 |
| Popis: |
Background In patients with distal bifurcation left main stem lesions requiring intervention, the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Coronary Stent Study trial found a non-significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularisation) favouring the stepwise provisional strategy, compared with the systematic dual stenting.Aims To estimate the 1-year cost-effectiveness of stepwise provisional versus systematic dual stenting strategies.Methods Costs in France and the UK, and MACE were calculated in both groups to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Uncertainty was explored by probabilistic bootstrapping. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the healthcare provider with a time horizon of 1 year.Results The cost difference between the two groups was €−755 (€5700 in the stepwise provisional group and €6455 in the systematic dual stenting group, p value |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
