Divergence vs. Decision P-values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice
Autor: | Greenland, Sander |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 50, 1-35 (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: | Working Paper |
DOI: | 10.1111/sjos.12625 |
Popis: | There are two distinct definitions of 'P-value' for evaluating a proposed hypothesis or model for the process generating an observed dataset. The original definition starts with a measure of the divergence of the dataset from what was expected under the model, such as a sum of squares or a deviance statistic. A P-value is then the ordinal location of the measure in a reference distribution computed from the model and the data, and is treated as a unit-scaled index of compatibility between the data and the model. In the other definition, a P-value is a random variable on the unit interval whose realizations can be compared to a cutoff alpha to generate a decision rule with known error rates under the model and specific alternatives. It is commonly assumed that realizations of such decision P-values always correspond to divergence P-values. But this need not be so: Decision P-values can violate intuitive single-sample coherence criteria where divergence P-values do not. It is thus argued that divergence and decision P-values should be carefully distinguished in teaching, and that divergence P-values are the relevant choice when the analysis goal is to summarize evidence rather than implement a decision rule. Comment: 49 pages. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2023, issue 1, with discussion and rejoinder in issue 3 |
Databáze: | arXiv |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |