| Popis: |
Vorticity is central to the nature of, and dynamical processes in turbulence, including turbulence in astrophysical fluids. The results of \cite{Raymond20a,Raymond20b} on vorticity in the post-shock fluid of the Cygnus Loop supernova remnant are therefore of great interest. We consider the degree to which spectroscopic measurements of an optically-thin line, the most common type of astronomical velocimetry, can yield unambiguous measurements of the vorticity in a fluid. We consider an ideal case of observations in the plane of a flow which may or may not contain vorticity. In one case, the flow possesses vorticity in a direction perpendicular to the plane of observations. In the other case, the flow is irrotational (zero vorticity) by construction. The observationally-deduced vorticity (referred to as the {\em pseudovorticity}) is inferred from spatial differences in the line-of-sight component of velocity, and assumptions of symmetry. My principal result is that in the case of the vortical flow, the pseudovorticity is a reasonable match for the true vorticity. However, and importantly, the pseudovorticity in the case of the irrotational flow field is also nonzero, and comparable in magnitude to that for a vortical flow. The conclusion of this paper is that while astronomical spectroscopic observations may yield a good estimate of the vorticity in a remote fluid, the robustness of such an inference cannot be insured. |
