Widespread winners and narrow-ranged losers: Land use homogenizes biodiversity in local assemblages worldwide
Autor: | Newbold, Tim, Hudson, Lawrence N., Contu, Sara, Hill, Samantha L. L., Beck, Jan, Liu, Yunhui, Meyer, Carsten, Phillips, Helen R. P., Scharlemann, Jörn P. W., Purvis, Andy |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Computer and Information Sciences
Conservation of Natural Resources Ecological Metrics QH301-705.5 Social Sciences Forests Human Geography HD0101 Ecosystems QH301 Natural Resources Land Use Animals Humans Biology (General) Ecosystem Taxonomy Data Management Conservation Science QH0075 Geography Ecology Ecology and Environmental Sciences Organisms Biology and Life Sciences Eukaryota Species Diversity Agriculture Biodiversity Terrestrial Environments Biogeography Vertebrates Earth Sciences Research Article |
Zdroj: | PLoS Biology PLoS Biology, Vol 16, Iss 12, p e2006841 (2018) |
ISSN: | 1545-7885 1544-9173 |
Popis: | Human use of the land (for agriculture and settlements) has a substantial negative effect on biodiversity globally. However, not all species are adversely affected by land use, and indeed, some benefit from the creation of novel habitat. Geographically rare species may be more negatively affected by land use than widespread species, but data limitations have so far prevented global multi-clade assessments of land-use effects on narrow-ranged and widespread species. We analyse a large, global database to show consistent differences in assemblage composition. Compared with natural habitat, assemblages in disturbed habitats have more widespread species on average, especially in urban areas and the tropics. All else being equal, this result means that human land use is homogenizing assemblage composition across space. Disturbed habitats show both reduced abundances of narrow-ranged species and increased abundances of widespread species. Our results are very important for biodiversity conservation because narrow-ranged species are typically at higher risk of extinction than widespread species. Furthermore, the shift to more widespread species may also affect ecosystem functioning by reducing both the contribution of rare species and the diversity of species’ responses to environmental changes among local assemblages. Author summary Previous studies have shown that human use of the land, mainly for agriculture and settlements, causes a detectable but relatively small net loss of biodiversity. However, not all species are affected equally, and some species even benefit from the new habitats we create. One group of species of particular concern for biodiversity conservation are those that inhabit only a small area. These narrow-ranged species are at higher risk of extinction because it is more likely that any threats to the species (including human land use) will affect their entire range. Such species can also play a unique role in the healthy functioning of ecosystems. Here, we show that the observed small declines in biodiversity in human-disturbed land can be broken down into large declines in narrow-ranged species, offset by increases in wide-ranged species. All else being equal, this finding means that ecological communities are losing their distinctive, narrow-ranged species and are becoming dominated by the same species everywhere, leading to a reduction in global biodiversity. The divergent effects of human land use on narrow-ranged and widespread species are important for the conservation of already threatened, narrow-ranged species and may lead to a negative effect on the functioning of ecosystems. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |