| Autor: |
G, Rizzoli, E, Tiso, D, Scalia, A, Fracasso, D, Casarotto |
| Rok vydání: |
1995 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
The Journal of heart valve disease. 4(3) |
| ISSN: |
0966-8519 |
| Popis: |
Seventy-two operative survivors of acute type A dissection between 1973 and 1993 had a complete follow up with a 16 years actuarial survival of 57% and a reoperation free actuarial survival of 34%. Follow up was 100% complete and covered a total of 500.6 patients-years with a median of seven years. Distal tear location (proximal, medium or distal aortic arch) with retrograde dissection toward the aortic valve was the single most important predictor of late mortality with a relative risk of 4.4 (70%CL 2.4-8.2) (p = 0.016). Mortality rate of patients with an aortic valve prosthesis was 6.2%/patient-year vs. 1.7/patient-year without aortic valve prosthesis, with a relative risk of 3.4 (70%CL 2.0-5.8) (p = 0.02). This finding could be due to confounding of variables related both to death and need of aortic valve replacement. Therefore a multivariate proportional hazard analysis, with mandatory inclusion of possible confounders, was done. It showed that patients with aortic valvular prosthesis had eight times higher risk (70% CL 2.7-24.2); prosthetic aortic valves and conservative aortic root procedures had an unconfounded relative risk of 14 times higher (70%CL 3.4-58.7) (P = 0.06), whereas patients with a composite conduit had a six times higher risk (70%CL 2.0-19.9) (p = 0.11). These findings support the attitude favoring a selective approach to aortic root repair and oppose standardized use of aortic valve prosthesis or composite conduit in acute type A dissection. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
