| Autor: |
C W, Digiovanni, S, Holt, J M, Czerniecki, W R, Ledoux, B J, Sangeorzan |
| Rok vydání: |
2001 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 38(3) |
| ISSN: |
0748-7711 |
| Popis: |
The condition in which ankle dorsiflexion is restricted is known as equinus contracture (EC). Equinus contracture is purported to be associated with a number of clinical conditions. However, there are no data to support or refute a clinician's ability to diagnose EC by clinical exam. We prospectively evaluated the maximum ankle dorsiflexion with the knee fully extended in 68 people (34 patients with isolated fore- or midfoot pain and 34 asymptomatic subjects) both by clinical exam and by a custom-designed ankle goniometer. We compared the likelihood of agreement of the clinical impression (equinus, no equinus) to the maximum ankle dorsiflexion measured with the instrument at two different numerical definitions of EC (or =5 degrees andor =10 degrees of maximum dorsiflexion). When all subjects were included and equinus defined asor =5 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion, a clinician's ability to detect the equinus when it is truly present is 77.8%. If equinus is defined asor =10 degrees, this ability increases to 97.2%. Alternatively, if equinus is not present, as defined byor =5 degrees, then a clinician's ability to correctly diagnose no equinus is 93.8%. If equinus is defined toor =10 degrees, this ability decreases to 68.8%. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
