| Autor: |
Andrada, Seicean, Roxana, Stan-Iuga, Radu, Badea, Marcel, Tantau, Teodora, Mocan, Radu, Seicean, Cornel, Iancu, Oliviu, Pascu |
| Rok vydání: |
2011 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD. 20(1) |
| ISSN: |
1842-1121 |
| Popis: |
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is preferred for guiding drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, with a success rate exceeding 90% when fluoroscopy is used. When fluoroscopy cannot be used, drainage can still be performed, but no data regarding the safety of such a procedure have yet been published.To establish the safety of EUS-guided drainage without fluoroscopic control and to identify criteria for the selection of suitable patients.The pancreatic fluid collections considered suitable for EUS-guided drainage were5 cm in diameter, symptomatic, without ductal communication. We attempted EUS-guided drainage of PC prospectively in 24 patients: 9 with abscesses and 15 with pseudocysts.Drainage was successful in 20 cases (83.3%), with complete resolution after a median 18 months' follow-up. EUS-guided drainage failed in four patients (16.7%): one in the abscess group due to symptomatic pneumoperitoneum and three in the pseudocyst group due to thick wall. Drainage failure was associated with a diameter6 cm and wall thickness2 mm and was considered to be due to the sliding of the cystotome on the pseudocyst wall. During follow-up there was one procedure unrelated death (4.1%) and no pancreatic fluid collections relapses.Fluoroscopic control represents a helpful tool, but it is not always necessary for EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. EUS-guided drainage is possible, efficient and safe without fluoroscopy in selected pancreatic fluid collections with a diameter larger than 6 cm and a thin wall. Collections with a thick wall should be drained under fluoroscopy or referred directly for surgery. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
