Autor: |
P Y, Robillard, F, De Caunes, G R, Alexander, M P, Sergent |
Rok vydání: |
1992 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 12(2) |
ISSN: |
0743-8346 |
Popis: |
The Dubowitz assessment of gestational maturity was compared with the best obstetric estimate of gestational age based on date of last menstrual period (LMP) or ultrasonography performed early in the pregnancy or both. This study involved 384 low birthweight infants admitted to the neonatal tertiary center in Guadeloupe, French West Indies, during the period 1986 through 1988. The Dubowitz assessment exceeded the best obstetric estimation by an average of nearly 5 days. This overestimation by the Dubowitz method was observed at every gestational age and was greatest at gestational ages of less than 35 weeks. The physical characteristics of the postnatal assessment were in closer agreement with the best obstetric estimate than the neurological characteristics. These findings concur with other investigations that indicate that the Dubowitz postnatal assessment of gestational age overestimates the gestational age interval from date of LMP in low birthweight and preterm infants.Physicians used data on 384 low birth weight neonates born between January 1986 and December 1988, who were in the neonatal intensive care unit at Pointe-a-Pitre Hospital in Guadeloupe, to compare the Dubowitz assessment of gestational age with the best obstetric estimate of gestational age. They needed a valid estimate of gestational age to quickly differentiate premature newborns from small-for-dates newborns. The hospital had limited technical and human resources, so it needed to determine which infants were at greater risk. The Dubowitz assessment resulted in a mean gestational age about 5 days longer than the obstetric estimate. There was almost a 2 week difference in mean gestational age between the neurological component and the physical component of the Dubowitz assessment (35 weeks, 4 days vs. 33 weeks, 5 days). The 2 estimates agreed completely in just 25% of cases. They disagreed by at least 2 weeks in 18% of the cases and by at least 3 weeks in 8% of cases. The analysis indicated that the Dubowitz assessment consistently overestimated gestational age in both low birth weight and premature infants and that the mean difference increased as gestational ages fell. The Dubowitz assessment even had this effect when the researchers separated the newborns into those whose gestational age was based just on last menstrual period (LMP) and those whose gestational age was based just on last (LMP) confirmed by ultrasound at a gestational age 20 weeks. The neurological component significantly overestimated both the combined Dubowitz and obstetric values for premature infants, while the physical component tended to agree. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|