Autor: |
Sarah, Oslislo, Lisa, Kümpel, Rebecca Resendiz, Cantu, Martin, Möckel, Christoph, Heintze, Felix, Holzinger |
Jazyk: |
němčina |
Rok vydání: |
2021 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 165 |
ISSN: |
2212-0289 |
Popis: |
The number of patients visiting emergency departments (ED) due to acute but less than urgent treatment needs is increasing. A deeper understanding of emergency perception and decision-making competencies of patients is fundamentally important for developing strategies to reduce ED utilization. The aim of this study was to assess ED patients' subjective understanding of an emergency in general as well as relating to their own specific consultation. Additionally, the patients' perspective on the ability to make appropriate decisions in acute situations should be explored.Seventeen qualitative semi-structured patient interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.The majority of participants attributed their ED consultation to a subjectively perceived emergency situation. Interviewees mostly understood an emergency as a serious or life-threatening constellation associated with impending long-term health damage. They believed that uncertainty concerning the interpretation of their symptoms and associated anxiety may particularly promote situations in which referring to an ED appears to be the only alternative. Patients' health competencies were assessed negatively by a majority of interviewees with regard to assessment of complaints and decision-making in acute situations ("insecure patients"). In contrast, few patients, including those with chronic disease and experience in dealing with health problems, were considered to have a high level of competence ("confident patients").Improving patients' health literacy skills to strengthen their assessment of acute situations and their decision-making is important in order to promote appropriate ED utilization. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|