| Popis: |
We report the prognostic significance of tumor CT contrast enhancement within histological subgroups in 831 consecutive adult glioma patients of high-grade (n = 516) and low-grade (n = 315) histology. In the present report, a negative prognostic factor is associated with shortened survival.Survival analysis including Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, Cox analysis, and Aalen's linear model as implemented in SPSS and S-PLUS.Sensitivity and specificity of contrast enhancement as a test for high-grade glioma was 0.87 and 0.79, respectively. Enhancement was a strong negative prognostic factor comparable to high-grade histology in the total patient population. Enhancement was also a negative prognostic factor within the subgroups adult high-grade (Grade 3-4), anaplastic (Grade 3), and low-grade (Grade 1-2) gliomas (p0.001). The prognostic implications of initial enhancement declined in high-grade patients surviving beyond 36 months. Tumor contrast enhancement or calcifications (in parentheses) were present in 96% (3.6%) of glioblastomas, in 87% (7.4%) of high-grade gliomas, in 56.5% of anaplastic gliomas, and in 21% (16.2%) of low-grade gliomas. Calcification was a positive prognostic factor within the high-grade group of patients (p0.0001).Enhancement was a major prognostic factor comparable to high-grade histology in this glioma patient population. Enhancement was a negative prognostic factor within each of the adult subgroups high-grade, anaplastic (grade 3), and low-grade gliomas. Enhancement was strongly associated with but not pathognomonic for high-grade histology. |
Full text from SpringerLink