| Popis: |
BACKGROUND: Recent literature supports minimalist approaches such as splinting for pediatric buckle fractures of the wrist. Uptake of this practice, however, has lagged behind the evidence. Barriers to implementation of this strategy necessitate further investigation, and caregiver and patient preferences represent an obstacle that has not been previously evaluated. This study sought to examine caregiver and patient treatment preferences and factors influencing care decisions for buckle fractures of the wrist. We hypothesized that the majority of caregivers and patients prefer cast immobilization for buckle fractures of the wrist. METHODS: A 22-item caregiver survey was created to assess demographics, treatment preferences and influential factors. The survey was completed by a convenience sample of caregivers presenting with patients of any diagnosis to our pediatric orthopaedic clinic. RESULTS: 297 surveys were collected predominantly from mothers (81.2%) caring for 2.4 (SD 1.3) children. Forty-one percent had previously cared for a child with a fracture. Caregivers accompanied patients who were 9.0+/-5.0-years-old, 34% of whom were actively being treated for an orthopaedic injury. Caregiver immobilization preferences for buckle fractures of the wrist were: no preference (43.1%), cast (32.3%) and splint (24.6%). The doctor’s recommendation was the most influential factor on this decision while the child’s gender was the least of the factors assessed. Those who rated treatment durability and child’s activity level higher were associated with a preference for casting, while those who rated comfort higher were associated with a preference for splinting. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to characterize caregiver preferences regarding immobilization devices in the realm of buckle fractures of the wrist. Findings identified that preferences are mixed, with the interest in casting being less than anticipated. Factors influencing caregiver preference include the doctor’s recommendation, durability, the patient’s activity level, and comfort. Findings can help guide treatment discussions for providers seeking to implement splint-based immobilization strategies. Level of Evidence: III |
