| Autor: |
Frédéric, Pauer, Jens, Göbel, Holger, Storf, Svenja, Litzkendorf, Ana, Babac, Martin, Frank, Verena, Lührs, Franziska, Schauer, Jörg, Schmidtke, Lisa, Biehl, Thomas Of, Wagner, Frank, Ückert, Johann-Matthias, Graf von der Schulenburg, Tobias, Hartz |
| Rok vydání: |
2016 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Interactive Journal of Medical Research |
| ISSN: |
1929-073X |
| Popis: |
Background The European Union considers diseases to be rare when they affect less than 5 in 10,000 people. It is estimated that there are between 5000 and 8000 different rare diseases. Consistent with this diversity, the quality of information available on the Web varies considerably. Thus, quality criteria for websites about rare diseases are needed. Objective The objective of this study was to generate a catalog of quality criteria suitable for rare diseases. Methods First, relevant certificates and quality recommendations for health information websites were identified through a comprehensive Web search. Second, all considered quality criteria of each certification program and catalog were examined, extracted into an overview table, and analyzed by thematic content. Finally, an interdisciplinary expert group verified the relevant quality criteria. Results We identified 9 quality certificates and criteria catalogs for health information websites with 304 single criteria items. Through this, we aggregated 163 various quality criteria, each assigned to one of the following categories: thematic, technical, service, content, and legal. Finally, a consensus about 13 quality criteria for websites offering medical information on rare diseases was determined. Of these categories, 4 (data protection concept, imprint, creation and updating date, and possibility to contact the website provider) were identified as being the most important for publishing medical information about rare diseases. Conclusions The large number of different quality criteria appearing within a relatively small number of criteria catalogs shows that the opinion of what is important in the quality of health information differs. In addition, to define useful quality criteria for websites about rare diseases, which are an essential source of information for many patients, a trade-off is necessary between the high standard of quality criteria for health information websites in general and the limited provision of information about some rare diseases. Finally, transparently presented quality assessments can help people to find reliable information and to assess its quality. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
