| Popis: |
As the main implant material, coronary stent is one of the main factors that affect clinical treatment outcome and patient cost. The choice for coronary stent in clinic depends on multiply factors including patient preference, medical personnel expertise and current technology, and no recognized method has been established for the evaluation and choice of coronary stent. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and economy of a few drug-eluting coronary stents in clinic.A retrospective analysis was employed to study the cases treated by drug-eluting stent intervention in a third grade hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Based on the specific products, these cases were assigned into a domestic stent A group, a domestic stent B group, a domestic stent C group, and an imported stent group. According to the severity of the disease, they were divided into an angina pectoris, an acute myocardial infarction, and an ischemic heart disease subgroups. Layer analysis was carried out for inter-subgroup comparisons in terms of safety (indicated by mortality rate, complication rate, and infection rate), efficacy (indicated by 31-day return rate, 365-day myocardial infarction rate, restenosis rate, secondary intervention rate, and thrombosis rate), and economy (indicated by averaged total cost and coronary stent cost).Among the 4 products, there was no difference in safety (With all the indicators of these 4 stents taken into consideration, we conclude that hospitals may appropriately increase the share of domestic coronary stent in product selection and in-hospital management. This measure helps increase product localization rate and ease the financial burden for patients by reducing coronary stent cost. |
