Cost-effectiveness of an experimental caries-control regimen in a 3.4-yr randomized clinical trial among 11-12-yr-old Finnish schoolchildren
| Autor: | Pauliina, Hietasalo, Liisa, Seppä, Satu, Lahti, Ahti, Niinimaa, Jouko, Kallio, Pasi, Aronen, Harri, Sintonen, Hannu, Hausen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Counseling
Toothbrushing Dental Caries Susceptibility Cost-Benefit Analysis Oral Health Health Promotion Dental Caries Fluorides Tooth Loss Patient-Centered Care Humans Fluorides Topical Child Dental Care Dental Restoration Permanent Finland DMF Index Chlorhexidine Feeding Behavior Oral Hygiene Cariostatic Agents Treatment Outcome Anti-Infective Agents Local Health Education Dental Dental Hygienists Patient Participation Needs Assessment Toothpastes Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | European journal of oral sciences. 117(6) |
| ISSN: | 1600-0722 |
| Popis: | The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of an experimental caries-control regimen in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted in Pori, Finland, in 2001-2005. Children (n = 497) who were 11-12 yr of age and had at least one active initial caries lesion at baseline were studied. The children in the experimental group (n = 250) were offered an individually designed patient-centered regimen for caries control. The children in the control group (n = 247) received standard dental care. Furthermore, the whole population was exposed to continuous community-level oral health promotion. Individual costs of treatment procedures and outcomes (DMFS increment score) for the follow-up period of 3.4 yr were calculated for each child in both groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was euro 34.07 per averted DMF surface. The experimental regimen was more effective, and also more costly. However, the total costs decreased year after year, and for the last 2 yr the experimental regimen was less expensive than the standard dental care. The experimental regimen would probably have been more cost-effective than standard dental care if the follow-up period had been longer, the regimen less comprehensive, and/or if dental nurses had conducted the preventive procedures. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text