| Popis: |
Dental caries explorers may become contaminated during routine caries examinations with pathogenic organisms and thereby potentially transmit infections from one tooth to another within a patient. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the contamination status of explorers influenced the caries risk of second molars. Two explorer contamination statuses were defined: (1) contamination status 1--explorers which had probed a carious molar just prior to examining the second molar, and (2) contamination status 2--sterile explorers versus explorers which had probed several teeth. Caries examinations were performed by 4 dentists on a cohort of 4th grade students in Belize City. The examination dates and sample sizes (n) were: September-October 1989 (n = 1,277), January 1991 (n = 1,111), and January 1992 (n = 961), and January-February 1993 (n = 861). Within this cohort, there were 221 subjects who (1) had at least one pit and fissure carious onset on a caries-free second molar, (2) had no evidence of dental treatments, and (3) were examined by the same examiner during the entire study. After adjusting for confounding variables, the examination of a second molar with a dental caries explorer in either contamination status 1 or 2 had no substantial effect on the caries risk (rate ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-1.18, and rate ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.56, respectively). If a true rate ratio of 1.7 or greater was associated with the contamination status 1 and 2, these analyses had more than 99 and 80% probability of detecting it, respectively.Examining a sound second molar with a contaminated dental explorer either does not affect the caries risk, or results in such a small increase in caries risk that it can only be reliably identified in studies where the exposure of sound teeth to contaminated dental explorers is randomized. |
