Quantitative

Autor: Claudia, Ortega, Rebecca K S, Wong, Josh, Schaefferkoetter, Patrick, Veit-Haibach, Sten, Myrehaug, Rosalyn, Juergens, David, Laidley, Reut, Anconina, Amy, Liu, Ur, Metser
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: J Nucl Med
ISSN: 1535-5667
Popis: The aim of this study was to determine whether quantitative PET parameters on baseline (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and interim PET (iPET) performed before the second cycle of therapy are predictive of the therapy response and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Ninety-one patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (mean Ki-67 index, 8.3%) underwent (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT to determine suitability for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as part of a prospective multicenter study. The mean follow-up was 12.2 mo. Of the 91 patients, 36 had iPET. The tumor metrics evaluated were marker lesion–based measures (mean SUV(max) and ratio of the mean lesion SUV(max) to the SUV(max) in the liver or the SUV(max) in the spleen), segmented (68)Ga-DOTATATE tumor volumes (DTTVs), SUV(max) and SUV(mean) obtained with the liver and spleen as thresholds, and heterogeneity parameters (coefficient of variation, kurtosis, and skewness). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the association between continuous variables and the therapy response, as determined by the clinical response. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for the association with PFS. Results: There were 71 responders and 20 nonresponders. When marker lesions were used, higher mean SUV(max) and ratio of the mean lesion SUV(max) to the SUV(max) in the liver were predictors of the therapy response (P = 0.018 and 0.024, respectively). For DTTV parameters, higher SUV(max) and SUV(mean) obtained with the liver as a threshold and lower kurtosis were predictors of a favorable response (P = 0.025, 0.0055, and 0.031, respectively). The latter also correlated with a longer PFS. The iPET DTTV SUV(mean) obtained with the liver as a threshold and the ratio of mean SUV(max) obtained from target lesions at iPET to baseline PET correlated with the therapy response (P = 0.024 and 0.048, respectively) but not PFS. From the multivariable analysis with adjustment for age, primary site, and Ki-67 index, the mean SUV(max) (P = 0.019), ratio of the mean lesion SUV(max) to the SUV(max) in the liver (P = 0.018), ratio of the mean lesion SUV(max) to the SUV(max) in the spleen (P = 0.041), DTTV SUV(mean) obtained with the liver (P = 0.0052), and skewness (P = 0.048) remained significant predictors of PFS. Conclusion: The degree of somatostatin receptor expression and tumor heterogeneity, as represented by several metrics in our analysis, were predictive of the therapy response or PFS. Changes in these parameters after the first cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy did not correlate with clinical outcomes.
Databáze: OpenAIRE