| Popis: |
A denaturant m-value is the magnitude of the slope of a typically linear plot of the unfolding free energy change DeltaG degrees (obs) vs. molar concentration (C(3)) of denaturant. For a given protein, the guanidinium chloride (GuHCl) m-value is approximately twice as large as the urea m-value. Myers et al. (Protein Sci 1995;4:2138-2148) found that experimental m-values for protein unfolding in both urea and GuHCl are proportional to DeltaASA(corr)(max), the calculated maximum amount of protein surface exposed to water in unfolding, corrected empirically for the effects of disulfide crosslinks: (urea m-value/DeltaASA(corr)(max)) = 0.14+/-0.01 cal M(-1) A(-2) and (GuHCl m-value/DeltaASA(corr)(max)) = 0.28+/-0.03 cal M(-1) A(-2). The observed linearity of plots of DeltaG degrees (obs) vs. C(3) indicates that the difference in preferential interaction coefficients DeltaGamma(3) characterizing the interactions of these solutes with denatured and native protein surface is approximately proportional to denaturant concentration. The proportionality of m-values to DeltaASA(corr)(max) indicates that the corresponding DeltaGamma(3) are proportional to DeltaASA(corr)(max) at any specified solute concentration. Here we use the local-bulk domain model of solute partitioning in the protein solution (Courtenay et al., Biochemistry 2000;39:4455-4471) to obtain a novel quantitative interpretation of denaturant m-values. We deduce that the proportionality of m-value to DeltaASA(corr)(max) results from the proportionality of B(1)(0) (the amount of water in the local domain surrounding the protein surface exposed upon unfolding) to DeltaASA(corr)(max). We show that both the approximate proportionality of DeltaGamma(3) to denaturant concentration and the residual dependence of DeltaGamma(3)/m(3) (where m(3) is molal concentration) on denaturant concentration are quantitatively predicted by the local-bulk domain model if the molal-scale solute partition coefficient K(P) and water-solute exchange stoichiometry S(1,3) are independent of solute concentration. We obtain K(P,urea) = 1.12+/-0.01 and K(P,GuHCl) = 1.16+/-0.02 (or K(P,GuH+) congruent with 1.48), values which will be useful to characterize the effect of accumulation of those solutes on all processes in which the water-accessible area of unfolded protein surface changes. We demonstrate that the local-bulk domain analysis of an m-value plot justifies the use of linear extrapolation to estimate ( less, similar 5% error) the stability of the native protein in the absence of denaturant (DeltaG(o)(o)), with respect to a particular unfolded state. Our surface area calculations indicate that published m-values/DeltaASA ratios for unfolding of alanine-based alpha-helical oligopeptides by urea and GuHCl exceed the corresponding m-value/DeltaASA ratios for protein unfolding by approximately fourfold. We propose that this difference originates from the approximately fourfold difference (48% vs. 13%) in the contribution of polar backbone residues to DeltaASA of unfolding, a novel finding which supports the long-standing but not universally accepted hypothesis that urea and guanidinium cation interact primarily with backbone amide groups. We propose that proteins which exhibit significant deviations from the average m-value/DeltaASA ratio will be found to exhibit significant deviations from the expected amount and/or average composition of the surface exposed on unfolding. |
Plný text