[Assessment of trainee urologists' knowledge in urogenital anatomy]

Autor: V, Foulonneau, E, Chantalat, T, Prudhomme, J, Gas, A, Weyl, A, Manuguerra, W, Akakpo, M, Baron, M, Nedelec, I, Dominique, B, Gondran-Tellier, B, Pradere, M, Roumiguié
Jazyk: francouzština
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 32(3)
ISSN: 1166-7087
Popis: The purpose of this study was to assess trainee urologists' [interns and assistant heads of university hospitals (CHU)] knowledge of the anatomy of the urogenital system. An examination consisting of 10 timed (16minutes) multiple-choice questions (MCQ) based on urogenital anatomy assessments for students in third year of the general medical science diploma program (DFGSM3) was sent to members of the French Association of Trainee Urologists (AFUF) in May 2018 in order to compare the average scores of these two populations. In addition, a questionnaire consisting of epidemiological data, their opinion on the quality of education in anatomy and the willingness to have more courses on this subject was included in the examination. The same scale based on a score out of 20 was applied to both populations. Of the 501 AFUF members solicited, 144 answered all the questions (28.7%). The mean score for urologists was lower than that of DFGSM3 students (10.56±1.82 vs. 11.4±2.37 respectively) (P=0.0013). Moreover, the desire for further education in anatomy was widespread among urologists (87%). According to our study, urologists have less knowledge of urogenital anatomy than third year medical students. Many means are being implemented or are available to rectify this failing, especially since the majority of trainee urologists consider that there are insufficient anatomy lessons in the curriculum and would like to receive further education in anatomy. LEVEL IF EVIDENCE: 3.
Databáze: OpenAIRE