Long-Term Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Psoriasis Treated With Ixekizumab or Adalimumab: A Real-World Study

Autor: Andrew, Blauvelt, Nianwen, Shi, Mwangi, Murage, Terri, Ridenour, Carolyn, Lew, Najwa, Somani, Baojin, Zhu, Nicole, Zimmerman, Scott, Kern, Russel, Burge
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD. 21(4)
ISSN: 1545-9616
Popis: There is a paucity of long-term real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness of ixekizumab (IXE) and adalimumab (ADA). We compared real-world treatment patterns of IXE-treated and ADA-treated patients with psoriasis over 24 months in the United States.A retrospective observational study was conducted using IBM Watson Health MarketScanreg; databases. Adult patients with psoriasis havingge;1 claim for IXE or ADA from March 1, 2016ndash; October 31, 2019 were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address cohort imbalances. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of non-persistence, discontinuation, and switching. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds of high adherence. Persistence, adherence, discontinuation, reinitiation, and dosing and switching rates were also analyzed.The final cohorts comprised 475 IXE users and 3159 ADA users over 24 months. IXE users demonstrated higher adherence (36.3% vs 28.8%; Plt;0.001) and persistence rates (35.2% vs 28.8%; P=0.004), and a lower discontinuation rate (59.1% vs 65.3%; P=0.007) compared to ADA users. IXE users had a higher likelihood of being treatment-adherent compared to ADA users (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.24ndash;1.87), a lower risk of non-persistence (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.75ndash;0.95), and a lower risk of discontinuation (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.74ndash;0.94), respectively. Switching rates were similar in both groups (31.2% vs 30.0%; P=0.608).IXE users had better treatment adherence and persistence, and a lower risk of discontinuation compared to ADA users over 24 months. There was no difference in the risk of switching between IXE and ADA. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(4):399-407. doi:10.36849/JDD.6336.
Databáze: OpenAIRE