| Popis: |
Postoperative computed tomography (CT)-based dosimetric analysis of transperineal ultrasound-guided conformal prostate brachytherapy provides detailed information regarding the coverage and uniformity of the implant. However, there is no generally accepted standard for the optimal timing of the postoperative dosimetry. This report details dosimetric analysis and the effect of timing based upon CT and orthogonal film evaluation for ten unselected patients implanted with either iodine-125 (125I) or palladium-103 (103Pd). Within 2 hours after implantation, patients underwent a CT scan and the first of four sequential sets of orthogonal films. Subsequent orthogonal films were obtained on days 3, 14, and 28 postimplant. CT-based dosimetry revealed coverage of the prostate to the prescribed minimal peripheral dose (mPD) at 93.1 +/- 3.6% of the volume, the prostate volume receiving 150% of mPD was 38.2 +/- 8.7%, and the urethral and rectal doses were 114 +/- 12% and 78 +/- 19% of mPD, respectively. The implanted seeds seen on orthogonal films acted as markers for temporal changes in prostate dimensions, and the standard deviation of each dimension was used as input in an ellipsoidal volume calculation. Seed coordinates were self normalized to the center of gravity of each two-dimensional view and were measured relative to the linear regression line in the superior-inferior direction. The reproducibility of the anteroposterior (AP) film setup in terms of temporal variation in the angle of the regression line was markedly better than that of the lateral films, 1.8 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees vs. 4.3 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees, respectively. Dimensional contraction from day 0 to day 28 averaged 11.3% in the superior-inferior direction, 8.5% in the AP/PA (posteroanterior) direction, and 2.5% in the right-left lateral direction. This translated into a volume change of 20.9% (ranged 11.6-31.6%), which was determined by using the ellipsoid method. The half-life for edema resolution was 10.6 +/- 1.8 days (range 8.6-14.3 days). However, because of variability in the degree and extent of edema and its rate of resolution, we believe that it may be futile to define a single point in time as the most accurate indicator of the postoperative dose distribution. Rather, it may be preferable to accept universal standardization of timing and methodology for CT-based postoperative dosimetry, which would facilitate comparison of results between centers and maximize the information content of that single measurement. We conclude that day 0 represents the optimal time, because dosimetric evaluation at that time minimizes patient discomfort and inconvenience (a catheter is already in place), provides information about edema when it is near its maximum extent, and provides prompt closure of the learning loop and, as such, hopefully will result in improved implantation techniques and results. |
Plný text