Comparison of stent and indomethacin suppository efficacy in the prevention of acute pancreatitis after ERCP
Autor: | Icacan, Gamze, Onalan, Erhan, Yucesoy, Mehmet |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Cholangiopancreatography
Endoscopic Retrograde surgical procedures operative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug post-ERCP pancreatitis indomethacin Pancreatitis Risk Factors Acute Disease Anti-Inflammatory Agents Non-Steroidal Humans Original Article Stents Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretiography |
Zdroj: | Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis |
ISSN: | 2531-6745 0392-4203 |
Popis: | Objective: We aimed to compare stent and indomethacin suppository efficacy in the prevention of acute pancreatitis after ERCP. Materials and Methods: 76 high-risk patients undergoing ERCP were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups as indomethacin group, stent group and control group. Indomethacin group (n = 32) received 100 mg rectal indomethacin immediately after ERCP. A 5F pancreatic stent was applied to the stent group (n = 16) during ERCP. No prophylaxis was given to the control group (n = 28). Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender. ERCP pancreatitis was seen in 9.2% (7/76) of the patients. The incidence of ERCP-induced pancreatitis (PEP) was 3.1% (1/32) in the indomethacin group and 21.4% (6/28) in the control group. PEP was not seen in the stent group (0/16). The incidence of PEP was significantly lower in the indomethacin group than in the control group (p = 0.043). However, no significant difference was found between the stent and control groups, stent and indomethacin groups in terms of PEP frequency (p = 0.072, p: 0.90 respectively). Conclusion: According to the results of our study, rectal indomethacin administration decreased the frequency of PEP in high-risk patients. However, there was no significant difference in PEP prophylaxis between the stent and indomethacin groups. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |