| Popis: |
Our aim was two-fold, to study the interobserver agreement in tumour segmentation and to search for a reliable methodology to segment gliomas using25 patients with glioma, from a prospective and non-randomized study (Functional and Metabolic Glioma Analysis), were included.Interobserver variability in tumour segmentation was assessed using fixed thresholds. Different strategies were used to segment the tumours. First, a semi-automatic tumour segmentation was performed, selecting the best SUVmax-% threshold for each lesion. Next we determined a variable SUVmax-% depending on the SUVmax. Finally a segmentation using a fixed SUVmax threshold was performed. To do so, a sampling of 10 regions of interest (ROI of 2.8cmIn the pilot segmentation, the mean±SD of SUVmax, SUVmean and optimal SUVmax-% threshold were: 3.64±1.77, 1.32±0.57 and 21.32±8.39, respectively. Optimal SUVmax-% threshold showed a significant association with the SUVmax (Pearson=-0.653, p=.002). However, the linear regression model for the total sample was not good, that supported the division in two homogeneous groups, defining two formulas for predicting the optimal SUVmax-% threshold. As to the third procedure, the obtained value for the mean SUVmax background+3 SD was 0.33. This value allowed segmenting correctly a significant fraction of tumours, although not all.A great interobserver variability in the tumour segmentation was found. None of the methods was able to segment correctly all the gliomas, probably explained by the wide tumour heterogeneity on |
Full Text from ScienceDirect