| Autor: |
L, Azoyan, Y, Lombardi, M C, Renaud, A, Duguet, S, Georgin-Lavialle, F, Cohen-Aubart, G, Ibanez, O, Steichen |
| Jazyk: |
francouzština |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
La Revue de medecine interne. 44(1) |
| ISSN: |
1768-3122 |
| Popis: |
Before attending residency, 6th-year French medical students must validate a final examination including a practical clinical test in their faculty. However, the national ranking that determines their future specialty and region solely relies on a computerized knowledge test. Our goal was to investigate the association between the final faculty test and the national ranking test.In our faculty, the final examination includes a computerized theoretical test (similar to the national one) and a practical test: a standardized evaluation of semiology skills at the bedside and a standardized assessment of relational skills with role plays. The agreements between the national test and faculty computerized and practical tests were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).Data from 1806 students who underwent the three examinations from 2017 to 2021 were analyzed. There was a good agreement between the ranks in the faculty and national computerized tests: ICC 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.85). By contrast, the agreement between the ranks in the faculty practical test and the national computerized test was poor: ICC 0.13 (95% CI 0.08-0.17). Results were stable over the years.The agreement between the ranking of the current national test and the clinical skills assessed by a specific faculty test is poor. This could relate to a true independence or to different levels of motivation to perform well. Indeed, the result of the national test is the most important one as it determines their career. Incorporating a clinical assessment into the national ranking test will motivate students to acquire clinical skills and value those who perform well this practical dimension. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect