[Comparison of point of care capillary international normalized ratio (INR) with INR measured in venous samples]

Autor: Ángela, Roco, Elena, Nieto, Marianela, Quintana, Jessica, Muñoz, Víctor, Ortíz, Marcelo, Moreno, Fanny, Mejías, Gerald, Godoy, Johana, Zambrano, Stephanie, Bruna, Gabriela, Bravo, Claudia, Cabrera, Patricio, Salas, Valeria, Moena, Bryan, Leal, Marcelo, Suárez, Luis A, Quiñones
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Revista medica de Chile. 147(10)
ISSN: 0717-6163
Popis: INR is used to monitor the treatment with vitamin K antagonists. A strategy to reduce waiting times for sampling is to measure INR in a capillary sample using a portable point of care (POC) type coagulometer.To evaluate the correlation of CoaguChek Pro II™, Xprecia™ and microINR™ with venous INR measured at the clinical laboratory and their ease of use.Patients provided capillary and venous blood samples for parallel tests comparing Xprecia™ Stride with CoaguChek Pro II™ and with venous INR, microINR™ with CoaguChek Pro IITM and with venous INR. The devices' ease of use was assessed surveying the sampling staff.The three tested devices had good correlation coefficients with venous INR: CoaguChek Pro IITM 0.953 and 0.962; Xprecia™ of 0.912 and microINR™ of 0.932. The correlation coefficient of Xprecia™ with CoaguChek Pro IITM was 0.937 and microINR™ with CoaguChek Pro IITM was 0.976.CoaguChek Pro IITM, Xprecia™ and microINR™ results had a good correlation coefficient with INR measured at the laboratory. Our results indicate that, in the hands of trained users, POC-type coagulometers are reliable and acceptable for routine use in anticoagulant treatment control.
Databáze: OpenAIRE