Managing the Negotiation Process
| Autor: | Fairman, David, Chigas, Diana, McClintock, Elizabeth, Drager, Nick |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Alternative
Options Issue trade-offs Culture Positions FCTC Building trust World Health Assembly (WHA) Contingent agreements Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) World Trade Organization (WTO) Modes of decision-making Avian flu virus Article Negotiation Negotiation process Interest-based negotiation Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health Pandemic influenza preparedness negotiations Stakeholder process Interests Commission on Intellectual Property Rights Innovation and Public Health Framework convention on climate change Value distribution Brainstorming Criteria Value creation Mutual gains approach Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) Indonesia Implementation Preparation HIV/AIDS Follow through Issue mapping Single text approach Joint fact-finding Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health Innovation and Intellectual Property (IGWG) Brazil |
| Zdroj: | Negotiating Public Health in a Globalized World |
| Popis: | In global public health negotiations, the stakes are usually high and often time is of the essence. The outbreak of the SARS epidemic in late 2002, for example, illustrated how rapidly crises can occur and how immediate action may be required. Negotiations on immediate and short-term issues such as SARS, and even on long-term policies not triggered by a crisis, can be made all the more complex by diverse interests, conflicting understandings of underlying facts and linkages among the multitude of issues. Specific obstacles to joint problem-solving may include disagreement on the existence, certainty or severity of the problem; on the best way to tackle the problem or the likelihood of success; or on who bears responsibility to act, who will pay costs and who will manage the response. In the health sector, national leaders in key countries may be reluctant to acknowledge the urgent need to address the spread of a disease, either because they question the facts or because they fear that taking action will have negative impacts on their international image and/or domestic political support. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|