Popis: |
According to my reading of Añón’s proposal, a critical shift in our legal perspective is required for improving the performance of legal judgments and decisions vis-à-vis women’s concerns. Such a shift would entail overcoming standards of discrimination based on a comparison between unencumbered individuals, without their situated agency being considered—which results in comparing even when such comparison is impracticable—in order to embrace a contextual analysis of individual cases. The move from one pattern to the other implies assimilating the structural bases of discrimination, as well as the relevance of gender analysis for overcoming inequality. In the following I would like to keep arguing in the direction traced by Añón. I will focus on the two main aspects of her analysis: the comparator and stereotypes. In addition, I will consider intersectionality and the contribution of experts, and will analyse in detail the methodology of naming and the contextual interpretation of women’s rights. Onkraj diskriminacije. Po avtoričinem razumevanju predloga Marie José Añón, je za izboljšanje učinkovitosti pravnih presoj in odločitev v zvezi z vprašanji, ki se tičejo interesov žensk, potreben kritičen premik v naši pravni perspektivi. Takšen premik bi pomenil preseganje standardov diskriminacije, ki temeljijo na primerjavi med posamezniki, ne da bi se upoštevalo njihovo umeščeno delovanje - kar ima za posledico primerjanje tudi takrat, ko takšno primerjanje ni izvedljivo -, da bi sprejeli kontekstualno analizo posameznih primerov. Prehod od enega vzorca k drugemu pomeni usvojitev strukturnih temeljev diskriminacije, pa tudi relevantnost analize spola za premagovanje neenakosti. V tem delu želi avtorica nadaljevati v smeri, ki jo je začrtala Maria José Añón. Pri tem se osredotoči na dva glavna vidika njene analize, tj. na primerjalnik in stereotipe. Poleg tega obravnava intersekcionalnost in prispevek strokovnjakov, podrobno pa analizira tudi metodologijo poimenovanja in kontekstualno razlago pravic žensk. |