Polymorphisms of glutathione-s-transferase M1, T1, and P1 genes in endometrial carcinoma

Přispěvatelé: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bölümü., Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Tıbbi Genetik Anabilim Dalı., Özerkan, Kemal, Atalay, Mehmet Aral, Yakut, Tahsin, Doster, Y., Yılmaz, Emel, Karkucak, Mutlu, AAH-9791-2021, ABI-5648-2022
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2013
Předmět:
Blood sampling
Glutathione transferase
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction
Null allele
Cancer staging
Gene
Endometrium
Cancer risk
Obstetrics & gynecology
Middle aged
Glutathione S-Transferase M1
Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1
Genotype
Endometrium carcinoma
Aged
80 and over

Glutathione s-transferase pi
Oncology
Female
Multigene family
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Lung-cancer
Human
Adult
Glutathione-s-transferase
Bladder
Population
Genotypes
Case-control studies
Major clinical study
Adenocarcinoma
Polymorphism
genetic

Caucasian
Assosciation
Article
Glutathione transferase M1
Advanced cancer
Humans
Family
Polymorphism
Gst
Endometrial neoplasms
Aged
Genetic risk
Genetic predisposition
Carcinoma
Pi
Gene frequency
Glutathione transferase T1
Susceptibility
DNA polymorphism
Glutathione transferase P1
Genetic association
Maetabolism
Prospective studies
Controlled study
Popis: Objective: To investigate the polymorphism rates and possible roles of glutathione-s-transferase M1, T1, and P1 gene polymotphisms in the predisposition to endometrial cancer in Caucasian women. Materials and Methods: Serum samples and medical records were collected from 53 Caucasian women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer and 67 women of the same race without any known history of cancer. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was used to assess glutathione-s-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 gene polymorphisms. Polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method was used in salvage of GSTP1 gene polymorphism. Results: Frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were not significantly different between the controls and patients with endometrial cancer (56.7% vs 52.8%, p = 0.671; 32.8% vs 26.4%, p = 0.574, respectively). The authors were not able to demonstrate any association between neither GSTP1 genotypes nor allele frequencies and endometrial carcinoma in the population studied (p = 0.310, p = 0.318, respectively). Moreover, no significant association could be demonstrated with GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and clinical stages of endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference between the frequencies of GSTP1 AA and GG genotypes in relation to Stage I disease when compared with advanced stages of endometrial carcinoma (p = 0.03). In addition, no association was found between polymorphisms of GST suspergene family and non-endometrioid type endometrial carcinomas. Conclusion: These results suggest that GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms are not associated with endometrial cancer in the Caucasian population.
Databáze: OpenAIRE