| Autor: |
Josic U., Mazzitelli C., Maravic T., Ragazzini N., Jacimovic J., Mancuso E., Mazzoni A., Breschi L. |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Josic U., Mazzitelli C., Maravic T., Ragazzini N., Jacimovic J., Mancuso E., Mazzoni A., Breschi L. |
| Jazyk: |
italština |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Popis: |
OBJECTIVES The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) is considered to be nearly 50% on the world level, with older populations being more severely affected. NCCLs can cause both esthetical and functional problems. Universal adhesives are the latest generation of adhesive systems which, according to the manufacturers’ instructions, can be used in various adhesive strategies: Etch-and-rinse (EAR), self-etch (SE) and selective-enamel-etch (SEE). The purpose of this paper was to answer the following PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss and post-operative sensitivity (POS) equal for EAR and SE approach when restoring NCCLs with universal adhesives and composite restorations?”. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed with no language and date restriction through PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan; fixed-effects models were applied, and heterogeneity was tested using the I2 index. The significance level was set at p |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
