Conception of a party to proceedings in Polish general administrative procedure

Autor:	Majewski, Kamil, Majewska, Patrycja
Jazyk:	angličtina
Rok vydání:	2020
Předmět:	administrative procedure zákonná povinnosť právny záujem správne konanie legal obligations legal situation of a party to proceedings účastník správneho konania právny stav účastníka konania Parties to proceedings legal interests
Popis:	Autori charakterizujú koncept účastníkov konania v poľskom všeobecnom správnom konaní. Autori dokazujú, že účastník konania je ústrednou inštitúciou poľského všeobecného správneho konania. Autori naznačujú, že úplná neprítomnosť subjektu alebo neprítomnosť subjektu, ktorý môže byť považovaný za účastníka správneho konania, vedie k situácii, keď správne konanie nemusí pokračovať - nebude začaté, ak k tomu dôjde pred takýmto začatím (v dôsledku predbežnej kontroly) alebo bude zastavené bezdôvodne (bez prípadného rozhodnutia vo veci), ak takáto skutočnosť vyjde v priebehu konania alebo ak daný subjekt stratí postavenie účastníka v prebiehajúcom konaní. The authors characterizes the Polish concept of a party to administrative proceedings. The authors proves that a party to proceedings is a central institution of Polish general administrative procedure. The authors indicates that complete absence of a subject or absence of a subject that may be considered a party to administrative proceedings leads to a situation in which an administrative procedure may not proceed – it will not be initiated if this fact comes out prior to such initiation (as a result of preliminary check) or will be discontinued non-substantively (without any resolution in the case) if such fact comes out in the course of proceedings or if a given subject loses the status of a party to pending proceedings. 1. ADAMIAK B., BORKOWSKI J., Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019. 2. GNIEWEK E. (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019. 3. GNIEWEK E. (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2013. 4. HAUSER R., WIERZBOWSKI M. (eds.), Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2020. 5. MAJEWSKI K., General principles of Code of Administrative Procedure after amendment of 2017, Annuals of the Administration and Law no. 17 (1), Sosnowiec 2017. 6. MAJEWSKI, K. Glosa do wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Warszawie z dnia 21 lutego 2017 r., sygn. akt: VI SA/Wa 2550/16 (Prezes Zarządu SKOK/członek zarządu banku a strona postępowania prowadzonego przed KNF), Roczniki Administracji i Prawa nr XVIII (1), Sosnowiec 2018. 7. OSAJDA K. (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Warszawa , 2020. 8. WIERZBOWSKI M., WIKTOROWSKA A. (eds.), Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019. 9. ZAŁUCKI M., Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019. 10. Judgment of the SC of 29 May 1996, file reference: III ARN 96/95, Legalis no. 30013. 11. Judgment of the SC of 11 May 1999, file reference: I CKN 1148/97, Legalis no. 44463. 12. Judgment of the SC of 13 April 2012, file reference: I CSK 451/11, Legalis no. 490976. 13. Judgment of the SC of 4 March 2015, file reference: I UK 255/14, Legalis no. 1242096. 14. Decision of the SC of 8 January 2003, file reference: II CK 90/02, Legalis no. 56971. 15. Resolution of the panel of 7 judges of the SAC of 13 March 2017, file reference: II FPS 5/16, Legalis no. 1575484. 16. Judgment of the SAC of 22 June 1994, file reference: SA/Wr 104/94, Legalis no. 38659. 17. Judgment of the SAC of 12 April 2000, file reference: V SA 1935/99, Legalis no. 48834. 18. Judgment of the SAC of 5 October 2010, file reference: I FSK 1657/09, Legalis no. 343526. 19. Judgment of the SAC of 4 June 2013, file reference: II FSK 1533/12, Legalis no. 763468. 20. Judgment of the SAC of 7 August 2013, file reference: II GSK 567/12, Legalis no. 737850. 21. Judgment of the SAC of 27 January 2014, file reference: II GSK 1626/12, Legalis no. 909829. 22. Judgment of the SAC of 12 March 2014, file reference: II OSK 2477/12, Legalis no. 1067705. 23. Judgment of the SAC of 29 April 2014, file reference: II GSK 320/13, Legalis no. 1042396. 24. Judgment of the SAC of 8 May 2014, file reference: II GSK 377/13, Legalis no. 951419. 25. Judgment of the SAC of 1 December 2015, file reference: I OSK 626/14, Legalis no. 1400130. 26. Judgment of the SAC of 12 December 2016, file reference: II GSK 1924/15, Legalis no. 1591300. 27. Judgment of the SAC of 21 April 2017, file reference: I GSK 936/15, Legalis no. 1638128. 28. Judgment of the SAC of 18 October 2017, file reference: II OSK 2592/16, Legalis no. 1724635. 29. Judgment of the SAC of 20 February 2019, file reference: II OSK 812/17, Legalis no. 1898908. 30. Judgment of the SAC of 6 March 2019, file reference: II OSK 967/17, Legalis no. 1893222. 31. Judgment of the SAC of 16 April 2019, file reference: I OSK 1711/17, Legalis no. 1899145. 32. Judgment of the SAC of 12 June 2019, file reference: II OSK 1617/18, Legalis no. 1977786. 33. Judgment of the SAC of 18 June 2019, file reference: I OSK 2215/17, Legalis no. 2194377. 34. Judgment of the SAC of 3 July 2019, file reference: II OSK 2158/17, Legalis no. 2232820. 35. Judgment of the SAC of 10 July 2019, file reference: II GSK 2056/17, Legalis no. 2196440. 36. Judgment of the SAC of 26 September 2019, file reference: I OSK 178/18, Legalis no. 2247417. 37. Judgment of the SAC of 1 October 2019, file reference: II OSK 2064/19, Legalis no. 2247318. 38. Judgment of the SAC of 15 October 2019, file reference: II OSK 2879/17, Legalis no. 2247091. 39. Judgment of the SAC of 17 October 2019, file reference: II OSK 2442/18, Legalis no. 2263027. 40. Judgment of the SAC of 22 October 2019, file reference: I OSK 344/18, Legalis no. 2253634. 41. Judgment of the SAC of 22 October 2019, file reference: I OSK 346/18, Legalis no. 2253631. 42. Judgment of the SAC of 22 October 2019, file reference: I OSK 347/18, Legalis no. 2253632. 43. Judgment of the SAC of 14 November 2019, file reference: I GSK 1679/18, Legalis no. 2262434. 44. Judgment of the SAC of 26 November 2019, filer reference: II OSK 42/18, Legalis no. 2270647. 45. Judgment of the SAC of 26 November 2019, file reference: II OSK 191/18, Legalis no. 2262225. 46. Judgment of the SAC of 10 December 2019, file reference: II OSK 263/18, Legalis no. 2268792. 47. Decision of the SAC of 9 September 2010, file reference: II OSK 1697/10, Legalis no. 709097. 48. Judgment of the VAC in Lublin of 16 March 2005, file reference: II SA/Lu 102/05, Legalis no. 331594. 49. Judgment of the VAC in Warszawa of 16 May 2005, file reference: V SA/Wa 363/05, Legalis no. 101952. 50. Judgment of the VAC in Białystok of 27 October 2005, file reference: II SA/Bk 503/05, Legalis no. 72965. 51. Judgment of the VAC in Wrocław of 8 February 2006, file reference: IV SA/Wr 798/04, Legalis no. 375043. 52. Judgment of the VAC in Warszawa of 10 November 2009, file reference: VI SA/Wa 1092/09, Legalis no. 828525. 53. Judgment of the VAC in Poznań of 23 June 2010, file reference: I SA/Po 226/10, Legalis no. 252845. 54. Judgment of the VAC in Warsaw of 5 May 2011, file reference: VIII SA/Wa 36/11, Legalis no. 372072. 55. Judgment of the VAC in Poznań of 7 May 2013, file reference: II SA/Po 229/13, Legalis no. 780829. 56. Judgment of the VAC in Gliwice of 10 February 2017, file reference: I SA/Gl 1166/16, Legalis no. 1597556. 57. Judgment of the VAC in Olsztyn of 27 September 2017, file reference: I SA/Ol 300/17, Legalis no.1730659. 58. Judgment of the VAC in Kielce of 16 May 2019, file reference: II SA/Ke 165/19, Legalis no. 1941745. 59. Judgment of the VAC in Lublin of 17 May 2019, file reference: I SA/Lu 76/19, Legalis no. 1943467. 60. Judgment of the VAC in Poznań of 6 November 2019, file reference: IV SA/Po 276/19, Legalis no. 2246867. 61. Judgment of the VAC in Rzeszów of 19 November 2019, file reference: I SA/Rz 646/19, Legalis no. 2258186. 62. Judgment of the VAC in Rzeszów of 19 November 2019, file reference: I SA/Rz 647/19, Legalis no. 2258187. 63. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lublin of 30 November 2000, file reference: II AKa 216/00, Legalis no. 52159. 64. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Rzeszów of 3 February 2011, file reference: I ACa 434/10, Legalis no. 526617. 65. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Poznań of 22 August 2012, file refrence: I ACa 602/12, Legalis no. 737677. 66. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 26 October 2012, file reference: I ACa 484/12, Legalis no. 733714. 67. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Łódź of 2 November 2017, file reference: I ACa 1622/16, Legalis no. 1743645.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______4084::4b388e2e42f0e3ad052a16711822b187 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/16181 Zobrazit plný text záznamu