| Popis: |
Prijevare hranom uključuju razne oblike krivotvorenja, patvorenja i lažnog označavanja prehrambenih proizvoda kako bi se ostvarila ne pripadajuća ekonomska korist. Najčešći oblici prijevare s hranom su razrjeđivanje, supstitucija i prikrivanje nedostataka proizvoda tvarima zabranjenim prema nadležnim propisima, te proizvodi s certificiranim oznakama koji ne slijede propise certifikata. Nadležnim propisima se ovakve pojave ograničavaju, ali ih je nemoguće u potpunosti spriječiti. Pretpostavka je da prijevare s hranom postoje i na našem tržištu. Rad utvrđuje postojanost i učestalost prijevara s hranom na poljoprivredno-prehrambenom tržištu Hrvatske prema mišljenjima predstavnika proizvođača, distributera i stručnjaka. Ispitivanje je provedeno na uzorku od 50 sudionika na području Hrvatske. Istraživanje predstavnika će također omogućiti uvid u učestalost prijevara ovisno o podrijetlu proizvoda i učinkovitost sustava za zaštitu od prijevare s hranom. Analiza prikupljenih podataka provedena je primjenom metoda deskriptivne analize i kvalitativne analitičke metode usporedbom rezultata s drugim dosadašnjim istraživanjima. Food fraud involves various forms of falsification and false labelling of food products in order to obtain an undeserved economic benefit. The most common forms of food fraud are dilution, substitution and concealment of product defects with substances prohibited according to the relevant regulations, and products with certified labels that do not follow the regulations of the certificate. Competent regulations limit such occurrences, but it is impossible to prevent them completely. The assumption is that food fraud exists in our market as well. The paper will determine the persistence and frequency of food fraud on the Croatian agricultural and food market according to the opinions of representatives of producers, distributors and experts. The test was conducted on a sample of 50 participants in Croatia. The representative survey also provides insight into the frequency of fraud depending on the origin of the product and the effectiveness of the food fraud protection system. The analysis of the collected data was carried out using the methods of descriptive analysis and qualitative analytical methods by comparing the results with other previous researches. |
