Upravna izplačilna prepoved

Autor: Šuštaršič, Alenka
Přispěvatelé: Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, Neža
Jazyk: slovinština
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Popis: Institut upravne izplačilne prepovedi delno sloni na prostovoljnosti, kar je v nasprotju z bistvom izvršilnega prava. Na prvi pogled se zdi, da je obravnavani institut povezan z upravnim pravom, vendar to ni res. Upravna izplačilna prepoved je pravnoposlovni odstop bodoče denarne terjatve iz delovnega razmerja v korist upnika, ki ga odobri dolžnik sam, delodajalec pa mora tako razpolaganje potrditi zaradi nadaljnjih obveznosti, ki nastanejo zanj s trenutkom potrditve. Ker je obravnavani institut v vsakdanjiku pogosto uporabljen, njegova normativna ureditev pa skopa, je v tem magistrskem delu predstavljen podrobneje z vsemi odprtimi vprašanji, na katera sta opozorili tako pravna teorija kot tudi praksa. Kljub burni debati teoretikov o materialnopravni naravi instituta, ta ostaja nedorečena, medtem ko se je jasno izoblikovalo stališče o omejenosti prenosljivosti denarne terjatve iz delovnega razmerja, ki je doživelo tudi zakonsko ubeseditev. Manj dorečen je predmet upravne izplačilne prepovedi, ki je glede na gramatikalno razlago zakona zgolj plača, vendar se v teku razvoja družbe to pokaže kot nezadostno in omejujoče. Upravna izplačilna prepoved ima pravni učinek sklepa o izvršbi, vendar zgolj glede zagotovitve vrstnega reda poplačila upnika, kar nasprotno pomeni, da upravna izplačilna prepoved nima drugih učinkov sklepa o izvršbi. To se kaže zlasti v možnosti preklica upravne izplačilne prepovedi s strani delavca. The institute of administrative prohibition to pay out is partially based on voluntariness, which is in contrast with the very essence of enforcement law. At first glance, it seems that the institute in question is connected with administrative law, but this is not the case. The administrative prohibition to pay out is the contractual relinquishment of a future monetary claim from employment in favour of the creditor, which is approved by the debtor himself. The employer must confirm such disposal due to consequent duties that arise in the moment of confirmation. Since the institute is frequently used and its relevant regulatory framework is inadequate, the present MA thesis presents it in detail together with all open questions which were raised both by judicial theory and practice. Despite a heated debate of theoreticians on the substantive legal nature of the institute, the matter remains unsettled. However, a clear stance on the limitation of transferability of a monetary claim has been formed and statutorily articulated. Less settled is the object of administrative prohibition to pay out, which is, according to a grammatical explanation, simply a salary, but this has throughout society’s development turned out to be inadequate and limiting. The administrative prohibition to pay out has a legal consequence of the decree of execution, but only regarding the assurance of the sequence of repayment of creditors. Contrarily, this means that the administrative prohibition to pay out has no other consequence of the decree of execution, which appears especially in the possibility of reversal of the administrative prohibition to pay out from a worker concerned.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: