| Popis: |
V diplomskem delu obravnavamo zaporniško politiko v primerjalni analizi. Državi, ki smo ju izbrali, sta si podobni po demokratičnem sistemu. Slovenija je po obliki parlamentarna republika, medtem ko je Švedska kraljevina, vendar samo po imenu. Je ena izmed najbolj demokratičnih držav na svetu. V literaturi je navedena kot izjemno uspešna v delu z deviantnimi osebami. Tudi njeno rehabilitacijsko funkcijo zavodov za prestajanje kazni zapora literatura navaja kot zgled. Želeli smo preveriti, ali je švedska zaporniška politika res tako drugačna od slovenske, da ima dobre rezultate, in kakšni so njeni rezultati v primerjalni perspektivi. Uspešna zaporniška politika ima velik vpliv na družbo, saj preprečuje oziroma omejuje porast števila kriminalnih dejanj. Posledica je varnejša družba, kar je cilj vsake države. Iz statističnih podatkov je razvidno, da so države kljub podobnim sistemom različne. V raziskavi smo uporabili metode, ki se uporabljajo v družboslovnem raziskovanju. Za opis znanih dejstev in teoretičnih pojmov smo uporabili deskriptivno metodo, v analitično-eksperimentalnem delu analizo statističnih podatkov in primerjalno analizo dveh držav. Dobljene rezultate smo predstavili z logično razlago. V analizi smo ugotovili, da so vse skandinavske države uspešne v svoji zaporniški politiki. Njihov uspeh je delo z zaprtimi osebami, ki temelji na humanosti in zaupanju oziroma tako imenovani dinamični varnosti. Število zaprtih oseb, izračunano na 100.000 prebivalcev, je med Slovenijo in Švedsko podobno, skozi večletno obdobje pa sta razvidna trend upadanja števila zaprtih oseb na Švedskem in trend povečevanja števila zaprtih oseb v Sloveniji. Tema je aktualna, saj je v Sloveniji zasedenost zaporov velika. Čeprav se izvajajo zelo podobni programi rehabilitacije kot na Švedskem, je naša zaporniška politika manj uspešna. In the diploma thesis we address prison policy and use a comparative analysis. The chosen countries are similar in terms of the system of democracy. Slovenia is a parliamentary republic, while Sweden is a kingdom, but only by name. It is one of the most democratic countries in the world. All around the world Sweden is understood as very successful in working with deviant people, and also in the function of rehabilitation in institutes where prison sentences are served. We wanted to analyse whether Swedish and Slovenian prison policies really differ that much, whether these differences are the reason why Sweden is more successful, and we also compared their results. A successful prison policy has a major impact on society, since it prevents or limits the increase of criminal activities. The result is a safer society, which is the goal of each country. Nevertheless, according to the statistics, we see that, despite similar systems, the countries are different. In our study we used the methods which are used in social science research. The descriptive method was used to describe facts and already known theoretical concepts. In the analytical-experimental part, we used the analysis of the statistical data and we compared the two countries with a comparative analysis. We interpreted the results with a logical explanation. We established that all the Scandinavian countries are very successful in their prison policy. Their success in working with imprisoned people is based on humanity and trust or so-called dynamic security. The number of prisoners per 100,000 people in the researched countries is similar, but if we analyse the results over the years, we see that the numbers of prisoners in Sweden is in decline, while the number of prisoners in Slovenia increases. This is an important topic because even though the rehabilitation programmes in both countries are similar, the occupancy of prisons is still high in Slovenia and the prison policy is less successful. |
