Medsebojno motenje uporabnikov posameznih delov stavb

Autor: Zazijal, Marcel
Přispěvatelé: Juhart, Miha
Jazyk: slovinština
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Popis: Izvrševanje lastninskih upravičenj na nepremičnini lahko navzven predstavlja določena za druge osebe motilna ravnanja, kar pa je skoraj da neizbežen pojav pri uporabi prostorsko tesno povezanih posameznih delov stavb. Pravila sosedskega prava se smiselno uporabljajo za razmerja v etažni lastnini, zavezujejo pa ne le lastnika, temveč tudi vsakokratnega uporabnika (neposrednega posestnika). Temelj medsosedske ureditve je načelno prizadevanje sosedov, da se medsebojno ne vznemirjajo in da si ne povzročajo škode, pri tem pa morajo svoje pravice izvrševati pošteno in v skladu s krajevnimi običaji. Zaradi tehnološkega razvoja je sobivanje brez čezmejnih vplivov zgolj nedosegljiv ideal, zato je sosedsko pravo postavilo tolerančni prag, preseganje katerega pomeni prepovedano imisijo. Glavni obliki pravnega varstva zoper prepovedane imisije, ki je najpogostejše vrsta medsosedskega motenja, je petitorna negatorna tožba ali provizorična tožba zaradi motenja posesti, togost stvarnega prava pa se presega z obligacijskopravno popularno tožbo. Medsebojnih motilnih ravnanj uporabnikov pa ne predstavljajo le prepovedane imisije. Na neskončno premico motilnih ravnanj spadajo vsa dejanja, ki so za posameznika nevšečna, vse od golega verbalnega vznemirjanja na eni strani, pa do bistveno intenzivnejšega odvzema stvari na drugi. Jedro te naloge je bralcu predstaviti, katera pravna sredstva glede na različne kriterije, kot sta naprimer vrsta motilnega ravnanja glede na intenziteto in pravna podlaga za uporabo posameznega dela, veljavno pravo zagotavlja osebi, ki je z ravnanji motena. Exercising property rights relating to real estate may externally constitute a certain nuisance to others, which is almost an inevitable phenomenon in the use of spatially tightly connected individual parts of buildings. Rules of law regulating relationships between neighbours apply, mutatis mutandis, to relationships between strata-title owners and bind not only the owner but also each respective individual user (direct possessor). The cornerstone of the rules regulating relationships between neighbours is the principled endeavour of neighbours not to disturb and cause harm to each other, while exercising their rights fairly and in accordance with local customs. Due to technological developments, coexistence without cross-border influences is merely an unattainable ideal, and therefore the law regulating relationships between neighbours has set a nuisance-related tolerance threshold, which, if exceeded, constitutes a prohibited nuisance. The main form of legal remedy against a prohibited nuisance, which is the most common type of encroachment between neighbours, is the actio negatoria and the civil nuisance lawsuit, however, the rigidity of property law is surpassed by the tort law actio popularis. However, cases of prohibited nuisance are not the only type of mutual disruptive behaviours. The endless line of disruptive behaviours includes all acts that are unpleasant to the individual, ranging from mere verbal harassment on the one hand to a much more intense case of deprivation of possession on the other. The core of this thesis is to present to the reader what remedies are available, on the basis of the applicable law, to the aggrieved party suffering from encroachment, according to various criteria, such as the type of disruptive behaviour with respect to its intensity and the legal basis for the use of each individual part of the building.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: