Tikrumo paieškos: patyrimas, protas ir asmens atsakomybė
| Autor: | Bartkus, Rolandas, Bingelis, Arūnas |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | litevština |
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: | |
| Popis: | Teorinis filosofo protas, siekdamas tikrojo pažinimo, įveikia juslinio akivaizdumo regimybę ir iškelia egzistencinio apsisprendimo uždavinį žengti anapus šios regimybės ir paties mokslo idealių galimybių sferos – į esamybę, į tai, kas esti būtiškai. Fenomenologinė filosofijos kryptis, siekdama mąstymo ir būties sutapties, veiklųjį ir veikiamąjį tikrovės sandus suvienija patiriančiojo subjekto sąmonėje. Vis dėlto ši atliktis dar neužtikrina siekiamo pažintinio tikrumo – veikiau jis tampa asmeniui imperatyvu. Tokio privalėjimo galimybės formalioji sąlyga – galėjimas atsisakyti intencijos subjekto kaip siekiančiojo statuso ir tapimas pasiekiamuoju. Taigi tai, ko valingai siekti, kuo pasitikėti ir kam save patikėti, tampa pagrindine užduotimi: kitybė ir kitas – kitas asmuo, jo veidas, atsivėrimas transcendencijai fenomenologui tampa naujuoju tikrumo pagrindu, šaltiniu. Philosopher’s theoretical mind, when overcoming the appearance of sensual evidence, raises a task of existential decision to step beyond the ideal scientific possibilities into the presence, into what is. Phenomenological philosophy, seeking for the co-occurrence of being and thinking, unifies the active and the acted-on components of reality in the consciousness of the experiencing subject. This transaction does not assure the certainty of knowledge – it is rather the certainty itself that becomes an imperative. However, cogitation of such a relation opens a new possibility: to renounce intentional subject’s status of the seeker – and to let oneself be the one who is accessible. Therefore it is a matter of ontological importance what to strive for, what (or who) to trust and to what (or whom) dedicate oneself to: we are “struck by” the Other – a person, a face, conversion to transcendence becomes a new imperative of reality and certainty in itself. In this article certainty is investigated as a criterion of the knowledge of reality in attempt to analyse and compare the approaches to certainty through experience, mind and the imperative of responsibility for another person. Main objectives of the study are the following: to discuss the awakening of a theoretical mind in a junction of the appearance of sensual evidence and the evidence of mystery of being; to discuss the philosophical search for certainty guided by the mind, experience and egologics; to reflect over certainty as an imperative of another person. A comparative analysis of philosophical texts might be designated as a particular methodology of this study. A mind, that is searching for a real being beyond the appearance of sensual evidence, should raise a necessary condition of existential decision and its realization: it is not sufficient to only observe the phenomena and model in a field of ideal possibilities – an act of will is required, a mortgage of oneself for the purpose of becoming certain in the highest principles. A purely theoretical, contemplative relation to reality was pushed to periphery by a scientific-technical investigation through unjustified objectification of the world, also by devaluation of personal and active relation. This way a concept of certainty was changed radically, becoming too abstract and reduced. Therefore a post-classical philosophy may be understood partly as a reaction and an attempt to “return to the things themselves”, emerging from the nostalgia for the lost being, as well as an attempt to discover new philosophical approaches to reality itself – to a human being, world and God. [...] |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|