| Popis: |
The article analyzes the political and legal aspects of the functioning of the Institute of Ukrainian presidency in the system of the higher bodies of state authority. It is determined that the quality of the head of state depends on the constitutionally established powers, normative vested rights and responsibilities as well as the individuality of a person occupying the president's position. The methodological basis of the study was the use of the historical method which allowed to identify the factors that influenced on the changes of Ukrainian polity in the period of independence, comparative method to determine the level of confidence changes of the presidents of Ukraine at the beginning of their cadence, a year later and in the year of re-election, and the system method helped determine the prospects for the development of the Institute of Presidency in Ukraine, taking into account the chosen model of the parliamentary republic. It is proved that the socio-political perception of the Ukrainians, excessive individualization and paternalism in relation to the position of the President of Ukraine directly affect the distribution of authority in the country, concentrating it in the hands of a single person. As a result of the analysis, it was possible to determine the mechanisms that can help Ukraine to avoid the processes related to the processes associated with usurpation of power, accumulation of powers in one decision-making centre at the present stage of democratization: a definitive constitutional distribution of powers, reducing the political dependence of the law enforcement system from the commander-in-chief, eliminating “immunity to corruptions” of the Ukrainians, preservation the Independence of the media and creation a nationwide state development strategy. The future of the Institute of Presidency in Ukraine for the Parliamentary Republic will be a symbolic one, limited powers and low political interest of citizens, which will positively affect the ability of the Ukrainians to a conscious and rational choices of representatives, the development of ideological multiparty system, the formation of a stable and consistent collegial cabinet of ministers and the responsible prime minister who will implement the parliamentary program and will bear responsibility in front of it. |
