Conception et validation d’un outil d’évaluation de l’organisation des regroupements pluriprofessionnels en soins primaires en France
| Autor: | Jeanney, Marie, Piauly, Mathieu |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Université Grenoble Alpes - UFR Médecine (UGA UFRM), Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), Olivier Marchand |
| Jazyk: | francouzština |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
MESH: Assessment tool
MESH: Primary health care Outil d’évaluation Soins primaires Regroupement pluriprofessionnel Développement organisationnel Coopération interprofessionnelle MESH: Quality improvement Amélioration de la qualité MESH: Interprofessional cooperation [SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology MESH: Organizational development |
| Zdroj: | Médecine humaine et pathologie. 2017 |
| Popis: | Objective: For several years, we observe a development of collective and multiprofessionnal structures in primary care. There was no simple tool in French allowing their objective observation. The COMACS study consisted of designing a tool allows an analysis of organizational development and interprofessionnal cooperation in these structures. Methods: The questionnaire was developed par Delphi method from a literature review. A feasibility test was realized in 5 health centers. Property analysis was the subject of a cross-sectional, prospective study covered the health centers and multidisciplinary care homes of the Alpine arc in activity at 01/05/2017. The reliability was assessed by the coefficient alpha of Cronbach (CAC) and the principal component analysis. The concurrent validity was assessed by a correlation comparing the results of the questionnaire to those obtained with the IFP-MM maturity matrix. Results: A prototype questionnaire has got 53 questions spread over 6 dimensions. A feasibility test showed a good acceptability but no difficulty in understanding. The reliability, evaluated over 30 structures after an adjustment of the questionnaire, shown for 2 dimensions including 50% of the totals questions with CAC to 0,75 and 0,71. The concurrent validity, evaluated over 26 structures, shown a correlation between the 2 tools (r = 0,75 ; p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|