Autor: |
Munteanu, M. Tiniakos, D. Anstee, Q. Charlotte, F. Marchesini, G. Bugianesi, E. Trauner, M. Romero Gomez, M. Oliveira, C. Day, C. Dufour, J.-F. Bellentani, S. Ngo, Y. Traussnig, S. Perazzo, H. Deckmyn, O. Bedossa, P. Ratziu, V. Poynard, T. Castille, J.-M. Langon, T. Lawlor, D. Marra, F. Sørensen, T. Tribelli, C. De Minicis, S. Burt, A.D. Gouw, A.S.H. Lackner, C. Schirmacher, P. Terracciano, L. Brain, J. Bury, Y. Cabibi, D. David, E. Losi, L. Montani, M. Pareja, M.J. Wendum, D. Wrba, F. Ziol, M. Thabut, D. Moussalli, J. Lebray, P. Rudler, M. Bismuth, F.I. Rosmorduc, O. Calmus, Y. Hartemann, A. Jacqueminet, S. Bruckert, E. Giral, P. Naveau, S. Perlemuter, G. Varsat, B. Mercadier, A. the FLIP Consortium the FibroFrance Group |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2016 |
Popis: |
Background: Blood tests of liver injury are less well validated in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Aims: To improve the validation of three blood tests used in NAFLD patients, FibroTest for fibrosis staging, SteatoTest for steatosis grading and ActiTest for inflammation activity grading. Methods: We pre-included new NAFLD patients with biopsy and blood tests from a single-centre cohort (FibroFrance) and from the multicentre FLIP consortium. Contemporaneous biopsies were blindly assessed using the new steatosis, activity and fibrosis (SAF) score, which provides a reliable and reproducible diagnosis and grading/staging of the three elementary features of NAFLD (steatosis, inflammatory activity) and fibrosis with reduced interobserver variability. We used nonbinary-ROC (NonBinAUROC) as the main endpoint to prevent spectrum effect and multiple testing. Results: A total of 600 patients with reliable tests and biopsies were included. The mean NonBinAUROCs (95% CI) of tests were all significant (P < 0.0001): 0.878 (0.864–0.892) for FibroTest and fibrosis stages, 0.846 (0.830–0.862) for ActiTest and activity grades, and 0.822 (0.804–0.840) for SteatoTest and steatosis grades. FibroTest had a higher NonBinAUROC than BARD (0.836; 0.820–0.852; P = 0.0001), FIB4 (0.845; 0.829–0.861; P = 0.007) but not significantly different than the NAFLD score (0.866; 0.850–0.882; P = 0.26). FibroTest had a significant difference in median values between adjacent stage F2 and stage F1 contrarily to BARD, FIB4 and NAFLD scores (Bonferroni test P < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with NAFLD, SteatoTest, ActiTest and FibroTest are non-invasive tests that offer an alternative to biopsy, and they correlate with the simple grading/staging of the SAF scoring system across the three elementary features of NAFLD: steatosis, inflammatory activity and fibrosis. © 2016 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|