Judical division of joint property (comparative aspect with austrian and croatian legal order)

Autor: Karajković, Majda
Přispěvatelé: Vrenčur, Renato
Jazyk: slovinština
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Maribor
Popis: Solastnina, kot ena izmed osnovnih oblik lastninskega razmerja več oseb na isti nerazdeljeni stvari, v sebi pogosto skriva nasprotujoče si interese solastnikov ter predstavlja izvor nesoglasij in sporov (communio est mater rixarum), ne glede na to, ali je nastala na podlagi zakona ali po volji solastnikov. V primerih kadar v solastninski skupnosti ni več mogoče doseči učinkovitega upravljanja stvari, solastniki pa zaradi medsebojnih nesporazumov ne morejo uresničevati svojih interesov ali ustvariti koristi, ki bi jo sicer lahko ali jo pričakujejo od svoje lastnine, ima vsak solastnik zakonsko neodtujljivo in nezastarljivo pravico zahtevati delitev solastnine in s tem prenehanje solastniške skupnosti. Kljub dejstvu, da gre za institut, ki je v našem pravnem prostoru že vrsto let, se sodišča v sodnem delitvenem postopku pogosto soočajo z vprašanji brez enoznačnih in jasnih odgovorov, ki pa privedejo do različnih rešitev. Kompleksnost postopka razdružitve solastninske skupnosti pa se kaže tudi v realizaciji delitve oziroma sklepa o delitvi, kjer se največ težav pojavi prav pri izvršitvi sklepa o civilni delitvi nepremičnine v solastnini, saj sta postopka prostovoljne in prisilne sodne prodaje pomanjkljivo in nekonsistentno pravno urejena ter kot taka neučinkovita za vse udeležence postopka. Joint property, as one of the basic forms of ownership of several persons on the same undivided thing, often hides the conflicting interests of co-owners and represents the source of disagreements and disputes (communio est mater rixarum), regardless of whether it was created on the basis of the law or at co-owners will. In cases where it is no longer posible to achieve effective management of thing in a joint property, and co-owners due to mutual misunderstandings can not realize their interests or create benefits that they could or expect from their property, each co-owner has a legal inalienable right to demand the devidion od jonit property and achieve termination of joint proprety. Despite the fact that this is an institute that has been in our legal space for many years now, the courts in ithe judicial separation process often face issues without distinct and clear answers, which lead to different solutions. The comlexity of the process of separation of joint property is evident in the realization part of the division of things, where most problems occur precisely in the execution of the decision on the civil division of the joint property, since judical procedures for the voluntary and forced sale are insufficiently and inconsistently regulated and as such ineffective for all participants in the procedure.
Databáze: OpenAIRE