Breast-feeding and childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from 43 observational studies

Autor: Cardwell, C, Stene, L, Ludvigsson, J, Rosenbauer, J, Cinek, O, Svensson, J, Perez-Bravo, F, Memon, A, Gimeno, S, Wadsworth, E, Strotmeyer, E, Goldacre, M, Radon, K, Chuang, L, Parslow, R, Chetwynd, A, Karavanaki, K, Brigis, G, Pozzilli, P, Urbonaite, B, Schober, E, Devoti, G, Sipetic, S, Joner, G, Ionescu-Tirgoviste, C
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2016
Popis: OBJECTIVE: To investigate if there is a reduced risk of type 1 diabetes in children breastfed or exclusively breastfed by performing a pooled analysis with adjustment for recognized confounders. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from literature searches using MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Authors of relevant studies were asked to provide individual participant data or conduct prespecified analyses. Meta-analysis techniques were used to combine odds ratios (ORs) and investigate heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: Data were available from 43 studies including 9,874 patients with type 1 diabetes. Overall, there was a reduction in the risk of diabetes after exclusive breast-feeding for >2 weeks (20 studies; OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.88), the association after exclusive breast-feeding for >3 months was weaker (30 studies; OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00), and no association was observed after (nonexclusive) breast-feeding for >2 weeks (28 studies; OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.07) or >3 months (29 studies; OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00). These associations were all subject to marked heterogeneity (I(2) = 58, 76, 54, and 68%, respectively). In studies with lower risk of bias, the reduced risk after exclusive breast-feeding for >2 weeks remained (12 studies; OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99), and heterogeneity was reduced (I(2) = 0%). Adjustments for potential confounders altered these estimates very little. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled analysis suggests weak protective associations between exclusive breast-feeding and type 1 diabetes risk. However, these findings are difficult to interpret because of the marked variation in effect and possible biases (particularly recall bias) inherent in the included studies.
Databáze: OpenAIRE