RUSSIAN ROULETTE - REJOINDER TO ROBINS
| Autor: | Walter E. Block |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | chorvatština |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Acta Economica Et Turistica Volume 1 Issue 2 |
| ISSN: | 1849-921X 1849-8469 |
| Popis: | U ovom radu nastoji se razumjeti i razraditi libertarijanska teorija kažnjavanja. Potpuno je nesporno, čak i među libertarijancima, da počinitelja kažnjivog djela treba prisiliti da vrati žrtvi ono što joj je oteo. Uz to, jednako je tako nesporno, bar među libertarijancima, da kazna za počinjeno djelo mora biti proporcionalna tom djelu. To najčešće podrazumijeva da ono što je počinitelj učinio žrtvi, treba učiniti i njemu. Na primjer, ako osoba A ukrade automobil osobi B, treba prisiliti osobu A da vrati automobil osobi B, a potom još dati osobi B automobil koji posjeduje osoba A. No što ćemo s činjenicom da je osoba A preplašila osobu B kad je izvršila taj kukavički čin? Treba li teorija kažnjavanja uzeti u obzir i tu činjenicu? Ako da, kako? Upravo to je predmet ovog rada. This paper is an attempt to understand and elaborate upon libertarian punishment theory. It is completely non-controversial, even amongst non-libertarians, that the criminal must be forced to return his ill-gotten gains to the victim. At least among libertarians, it is agreed upon, in addition, that the punishment for the criminal must be proportionate to his crime. This, typically, implies that what he did to the victim should be done to him. For example, if A steals a car from B, A must be compelled to return that automobile to B, and, then, to give B a vehicle owned by A. But what about the fact that A scared B when he committed his dastardly crime? Should punishment theory take that into account too, and, if so, how? That is the subject of the present paper. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|