BISKUP VJENCESLAV SOIĆ: ŽRTVA BORBE ZA OPSTANAK SENJA KAO VJERSKOG I OBRAZOVNOG SREDIŠTA

Autor: KREŠIMIR ŠKULJEVIĆ
Jazyk: chorvatština
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Zdroj: Senjski zbornik : prilozi za geografiju, etnologiju, gospodarstvo, povijest i kulturu
Volume 39
Issue 1
ISSN: 1849-0999
0582-673X
Popis: Uz Josipa Jurja Strossmayera i Jurja Haulika, Vjenceslav Soić je bio treća najvažnija ličnost u crkvenim krugovima nakon obnove ustavnog stanja 1861. na području Kraljevine Hrvatske, Slavonije i Dalmacije. Dosadašnja istraživanja promatraju Vjenceslava Soića u pozitivnoj ulozi svećenika, dok se o njegovim političkim aktivnostima, poznanstvima i financijskim prihodima ništa ne govori. Time je ostala neistražena njegova politička djelatnost i korelacija politike s njegovim napredovanjem u crkvenoj hijerarhiji i financijskim prihodima. Iz te se perspektive jasnije odražava dalekovidnost javnog djelovanja Soića, koju je kapitalizirao između banova Josipa Šokčevića i Ivana Mažuranića kada je u Hrvatskom saboru formalno prešao na stranu unionista. Otkrivaju se dosad neistraženi detalji koji su vezani uz njega: kandidatura 1869. godine za mjesto zagrebačkog nadbiskupa, njegov odnos s Antunom Vakanovićem, svojevremenim namjesnikom banske časti te sukob sa Senjskim kaptolom u lipnju 1875., je poslužio kao povod za njegovo svrgavanje s biskupske stolice. Kronološki promatrajući, rad obuhvaća razdoblje između 1869. i 1875. godine.
The paper uncovers previously unknown things which are connected to the life of Vjenceslav Soić, particularly from the period between 1869 and 1875. Simultaneously followed are the activities which are connected with Soić’s political activity, the annual incomes and his status in the church hierarchy. From this it can be seen that at almost the same time an improvement in all areas (with the church, finances and politics) of activity was experienced. About how informed and regularly updated he was about things, which happened in his interest around him, is witnessed in the letters which Antun Vakanović sent, the then minister of finance, president of the parliament and acting ban. After that Senj came under civil administration and things began to change. The complexity of contemporaneous relations were shown sufficiently with the departure of Soić from the position of bishop. The cause may have been more, but the occasion was obvious – a double celebration in June 1875 in the Pope’s name. This initiated a public lynching against Soić who tried to sanitise the damage and reach a compromising solution with the closure of the lyceum, which could have been one of the causes of the dispute. Bedini, who wanted Rijeka to be the new centre of the bishopric, presented another cause. Senj became a completely different centre when it came under civil rule in April 1872, and Soić was no longer needed by the Emperor who ceased to be his supporter and thus held it in the place of the bishop.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: