Effective Investigation Standards Regarding the Criminal Proceedings of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia
| Autor: | Snježana Bagić |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | chorvatština |
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu Volume 26 Issue 2 |
| ISSN: | 2670-9996 2459-6531 |
| Popis: | Postupovna obveza provođenja učinkovite istrage postala je načelo koje se ne odnosi samo na postupovni stadij nego i na cjelokupan kazneni postupak. Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske preuzeo je aktivnu ulogu u pronalaženju odgovarajućeg pravnog sredstva koje na nacionalnoj razini omogućava, i prije nego što je iscrpljen dopušteni pravni put, (djelotvorno) razmatranje prigovora zbog neprovođenja istrage kaznenih djela vezanih uz pravo na život iz članka 21. stavka 1. Ustava (članka 2. stavka 1. Konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava) i zabranu zlostavljanja (mučenja) iz članka 23. stavka 1. Ustava (članka 3. Konvencije). U radu se daje pregled ustavnosudske prakse u definiranju standarda u odnosu na ta pitanja. The procedural obligation to conduct effective investigation has become a principle that applies not only to the procedural stage but to the entire criminal proceedings. The Constitutional Court has taken an active role in establishing an appropriate legal remedy at the national level which enables, even prior to the exhaustion of available legal remedies, an efficient review of complaints for failure to conduct an investigation of criminal offences related to the right to life under Article 21 paragraph 1 of the Constitution (Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights) and the prohibition of ill-treatment (torture) under Article 23 paragraph 1 of the Constitution (Article 3 of the Convention). This article provides an overview of the Constitutional Court case law on defining standards in relation to the previously stated issues. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|