Confiabilidade e consistência interna na avaliação da dor neonatal de prematuros durante o procedimento de aspiração traqueal: estudo prospectivo

Autor: Oliveira, Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de, Formiga, Cibelle Kayenne Martins Roberto, Ramos, Bruna Abreu, Noleto, Rafaela dos Santos, Moreira, Nayara Nubia de Sousa, Amaral, Waldemar Naves do
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: BrJP, Volume: 5, Issue: 4, Pages: 341-346, Published: 17 FEB 2023
Popis: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inadequate pain assessment in preterm infants (PI) is a persistent problem. Currently, a precise pain assessment is one of the main challenges for health professionals in the intensive care units (NICU). The objective of this study was to verify the correlation between the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) and Premature Infant Pain Prole - Revised (PIPP-R), internal consistency, and inter-evaluator reliability on pain assessment during aspiration in PI. METHODS: Prospective observational study with low birth weight PI (< 2500 g), hemodynamically stable, minimal or no sedation, under mechanical ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, nasal cannula oxygen, or ambient air, and needing aspiration during hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit in the period from 2019 to 2020.. PI were evaluated during three different aspiration procedures: without intervention (1), using gentle touch (2), and using sucrose (3). NIPS and PIPP-R instruments were applied, while internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s alpha, reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and concurrent validity using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Fifty PIs requiring tracheal aspiration were evaluated. NIPS and PIPP-R showed high (Cronbach α: 0.824) and moderate (Cronbach α: 0.655) internal consistency. Inter-e- valuation reliability was excellent in all aspiration procedures for NIPS (1: 0.991, 2: 0.987, and 3: 0.993) and PIPP-R (1: 0.997, 2: 0.986, and 3: 0.977). Concurrent validity was observed only for aspiration without intervention. CONCLUSION: Although NIPS may have better clinical utility than PIPP-R, both instruments presented good internal consistency and inter-evaluator reliability and may be used for assessing pain during aspiration in PI. RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A avaliação inadequada da dor em recém-nascidos prematuros (RNPT) é um problema persistente. A avaliação precisa da dor é um dos principais desafios para profissionais de saúde nas Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatais (UTIN). O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a associação entre a Escala de Dor Neonatal (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale - NIPS) e o Perfil da Dor do Bebê Prematuro - Revisado (Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised - PIPP-R), assim como a consistência interna e a confiabilidade inter-avaliadores na aferição da dor durante a aspiração do RNPT. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal prospectivo com RNPT de baixo peso ao nascer (
Databáze: OpenAIRE