| Popis: |
No período de 1987 a 1991, foram avaliados os efeitos de cinco sistemas de produção de triticale: sistema I (triticale/soja), sistema II (triticale/soja e aveia-preta/soja, de 1987 a 1989, e triticale/soja e aveia-branca/soja, de 1990 a 1991), sistema III (triticale/soja e ervilhaca/milho), sistema IV (triticale/soja, aveia-preta/soja e ervilhaca/milho, de 1987 a 1989, e triticale/soja, ervilhaca/milho e aveia-branca/soja, de 1990 a 1991) e sistema V (triticale/soja, triticale/soja, aveia- preta/soja e ervilhaca/milho, de 1987 a 1989, e triticale/soja, triticale/soja, ervilhaca/milho e aveia- branca/soja, de 1990 a 1991). Usou-se o delineamento de blocos ao acaso, com três repetições e parcelas com área útil de 24 m². No presente trabalho, apresenta-se a análise econômica relativa àquele período. No período em que as condições climáticas trancorreram normalmente, o sistema III foi a melhor alternativa a ser oferecida aos agricultores, do ponto de vista de rentabilidade. Quando as condições climáticas ocorreram adversamente, o sistema II mostrou maior retorno econômico do que os demais sistemas estudados. From 1987 to 1991, in Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, the effects of production systems on triticale crop were assessed at the Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Trigo. Five systems for triticale were studied: system I (triticale/soybean), system II (triticale/soybean and black oats/soybean, from 1987 to 1989, and triticale/soybean and white oats/soybean, from 1990 to 1991), system III (triticale/soybean and common vetch/corn), system IV (triticale/soybean, black oats/soybean and common vetch/corn, from 1987 to 1989, and triticale/soybean, common vetch/corn and white oats/soybean, from 1990 to 1991), and system V (triticale/soybean, triticale/soybean, black oats/soybean and common vetch/corn, from 1987 to 1989, and triticale/soybean, triticale/soybean, common vetch/corn and white oats/soybean, from 1990 to 1991). An experimental design of blocks at random with three replications and plots with 24 m² was used. Economic analysis over that period is presented in this paper. Over the period in which the climatic conditions were normal, system III was the best alternative to be offered to farmers from profitability standpoint. When climatic conditions were adverse, system II showed higher economic return, as compared to the remaining systems studied. |
