| Popis: |
This article deals with the acceptance of digital editions among scholars. In order to identify recurring points of criticism of digital editions, seven volumes of the online journal RIDE (a review journal for digital editions and resources) published between 2014 and 2019 are analysed as a text corpus and subjected to a meta-review. By identifying specific lexemes and phrases that introduce or support critical statements, it can be shown in which aspects digital editions generally (still) do not sufficiently meet the assessment standards and expectations of their reviewers. The results of the analysis may provide recommendations for future digital editions. |
