| Popis: |
To assess total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) under daily living conditions, the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique is considered the gold standard. This technique is accurate but also costly and requires specific lab equipment and expertise. It also provides an average measure of TDEE over a period of one to two weeks and hence no information on physical activity (PA) patterns is available. To overcome these shortcomings, activity monitors can be used to assess activity patterns and an estimate of TDEE can be made, provided the activity monitor has been previously validated in daily life using DLW. Most activity monitors contain accelerometers, that measure the acceleration of the body and hence represent body movement. By definition, body movement leads to energy expenditure (EE) and hence the two always need to be related. Activity monitors that provide an estimate of EE need to be validated so that the contribution of the sensor output to the prediction of EE is known. Subject characteristics such as body mass, height, gender and age already explain most of the variation of TDEE; the accelerometer should then represent the physical activity component of TDEE and improve the explained variation. Many activity monitors also contain additional sensors measuring other (physiological) output parameters such as heart rate, skin temperature, galvanic skin response or gps positioning. Although promising, so far there is no compelling evidence that these additional sensors improve the prediction of EE, so careful consideration is needed whether or not these are worth the extra cost, and the extra battery power and storage capacity needed. Again, it is important to know the individual contribution of each outcome parameter to the prediction of TDEE. In conclusion, activity monitors are valuable tools in PA research but also in nutritional research when energy balance is studied. |
