Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: Are surgeons getting better? A questionnaire survey of members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association

Autor: Poolman, Rudolf W., Sierevelt, Inger N., Farrokhyar, Forough, Mazel, J. Adriaan, Blankevoort, Leendert, Bhandari, Mohit
Přispěvatelé: Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Biomedical Engineering and Physics
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2007
Zdroj: Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 89A(1), 206-215. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.
ISSN: 0021-9355
Popis: Background: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume (The Journal) recently initiated a section called "Evidence-Based Orthopaedics." Furthermore, a level-of-evidence rating is now used in The Journal to help readers in clinical decision-making. Little is known about whether this recent emphasis has influenced surgeons' perceptions about and competence in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, we examined perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine among Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: Members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association were surveyed to examine their attitudes toward evidence-based medicine and their competence in evidence-based medicine. We evaluated competences using a newly developed instrument tailored to surgical practice. Results: Of the 611 members, 367 surgeons (60%) responded. Orthopaedic surgeons welcomed evidence-based medicine. Practical evidence-based medicine resources were perceived as the best method to move from opinion-based or experience-based to evidence-based practice. Four variables were significantly and positively associated with the competence instrument: (1) a younger age, particularly between thirty-six and forty-five years (p = 0.007), (2) experience of less than ten years (p = 0.032), (3) having a PhD degree (p
Databáze: OpenAIRE